DFJ East Coast Venture Challenge – LIVE BLOGGING

SCROLL DOWN FOR THE WINNER!!!

 I’m at the DFJ East Coast Venture Challenge finals. Will be live blogging here.

The 4 finalists are:

  1. Electro-Epi
  2. Widetronix
  3. JetEye
  4. Yan Engines

Going into Electro-Epi’s presentation now…

Electro-Epi

Adam Stanley, CEO, is presenting. His company is a team from Brown University. They make solar panels more efficient.

This is a $3.32 billion market.

EpiFoil is the material they developed. They’ve licensed it from Brown… not for equity – a strict royalty agreement. Claims they can scale rapidly… but wants to exit in 5 years. Seems a bit soon for a company trying to revolutionize the energy industry.

After getting published in a few trade magazines, they were approached by MIT students working on computer chips, because the existing material they were using cost $200 a sq. cm, while EpiFoil costs $0.06.

More info about Electro-Epi on their website.

Conclusion: Adam nailed this. Great work. Should dream bigger though.

Next up, Yan Engines.

Yan Engines (website)

 


Lu Yan is the CEO. His dad invented the D-Cycle Engine. It’s patented. This engine design is gets 30% more fuel efficiency… the electro-hybrid engine only gets 18% more efficiency.

 

This is really cool technology. The basic premise is that converting existing engine manufacturing would mean changing only 5 parts, while fuel cell and other methods means the entire engine.

WOW. Stats: if every car in the US used this engine, we would save 2.8 million barrels of oil a day less, bringing us back to levels of consumption from 1973. This eliminate the need for all Middle East imports (Hugo loves this!). Eliminates need for oil from Alaska (Polar Bears love this!).

Once again, it’s a pretty impressive company.

… networking break …

Widetronix (website)

Changing Pacemaker batteries costs $6B in the US annually. Widetronix creates a battery which lasts 25 years… reducing costs by $3.9 billion.

Since it could take up to 4 years to get FDA approval, they are going to go after defense and security first, and have already shipped prototypes. But, they point out, the Pacemaker and medical market is the real growth market here… people are getting implants like Pacemakers earlier in their lives.

These guys have a very interesting technology, though the presentation is not as good as the others. The main guy presenting is not nearly as good as his partner. The shorter guy should be doing their presentations. Quote: “We’ve confused people before…”

I just realized what the product actually is: a nuclear battery. Cool.

Interesting question from the VC panel, then: anything more interesting than security and health to sell this thing? Toys? Anything? Answer: Anything where changing batteries could be dangerous, like batteries encased by water.

Now for JetEye from Yale…

JetEye

These guys prevent planes from crashing. Awesome. Already can tell, not the best presentation skills, but they also have very interesting technology.

They have two patents for their technology, which basically watches over jet engine blades in a new way, leveraging sensors already in engines. Their first customer is the US govn’t and the Joint Strike Fighter program. Sounds badass… they think it does too and think it will help them get into the commercial space. Currently no commercial engines have the sensor they need embedded, only the JSF, but apparently they all will soon.

Presentation note: they are jumping around from person to person in the team. Nice to include different people for their different expertise, but it’s very confusing. The CEO or President (two diff people in their case) should be doing all of it. Now, as they’re confused about a question, they have 4 people on stage looking confused, not just one. That doesn’t look good. One guy isn’t even speaking at all.

Just unveiled… they don’t actually have the JSF deal. But Pratt (the military contractor) is “very interested” —  all they need is $250,000 to do the “most realistic testing possible,” rather than just the lab testing they’ve done now.

I’m being a little harsh here… they are really smart folks, clearly, and have interesting technology. Not as powerful as BricaBox’s military software ;-) but pretty darn awesome.

Just just said they needed only $400,000 to break-even. One of the VCs just asked: “What? Are you a Web 2.0 company?” Answer: well, the heart of this is software, since we’re relying on the existing sensors, so the answer is sort of yes.

Team of 4 now makes sense: They are all friends. Aww. That’s nice. Actually, that’s smart. People who trust each other work well together.

—-

Okay, now they are breaking to deliberate on who’s going to win. Battery is dying, so I’ll be back when they announce the winner. Follow me on Twitter (@innonate) and I’ll let you know when I’m back.

AND THE WINNER IS:

3rd Place: Electro-Epi

2nd Place: JetEye

1st Place: Winetronix

Congrats guys!

This entry was posted in Business, Entrepreneurship and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Did you ever find out the details of the prize? Is it an equity investment, how is it structured?

    I've been seeing more of these equity prize competitions and I think its an interesting model, particularly in the angel space where it helps attract investors and get them comfortable with the investment process.

  • Hey guys,

    The prize is structured as a convertible note, which in my opinion is the best way option for the teams.

    The convertible note is designed to be an equity investment, but gives the investor some protection if the company goes under (since it is treated as debt until conversion).

    Some details:
    - It is a zero interest loan (making it really easy on the company's finances)
    - The management is not personally liable (minizing personal risk for the team)
    - The valuation is largely a function of the price at the next round, enabling the transaction to take place without a valuation discussion (making life a lot easier for the team to accept).

    I think it's a great structure and even wrote a post about it: http://www.markpeterdavis.com/getventure/2008/02/convertible-deb.html

    -Mark Davis
  • Hello!

    Sorry to hit everyone up with a bulk email like this, but its for a good cause!

    I wanted to let you know about Kiva (www.kiva.org), a non-profit that allows you to lend as little as $25 to a specific low-income entrepreneur across the globe.

    You choose who to lend to - whether a baker in Afghanistan, a goat herder in Uganda, a farmer in Peru, a restaurateur in Cambodia, or a tailor in Iraq - and as they repay their loan, you get your money back. It's a powerful and sustainable way to empower someone right now to lift themselves out of poverty.

    I've been volunteering there the last couple of months in their community outreach team, and I'm in charge of all of their social media efforts. Check it out and let me know what you think!

    Evan Bartlett
    evbart@kiva.org
    http://www.twitter.com/kiva
    http://www.kiva.org/lender/evbart

    Check it out!
    https://www.kiva.org/app.php?page=register&_isc=af4462e0-54b7-11de-911c-dc6669dc15d3&_te=inu
  • Mark,

    Thanks for the details. Now it makes a bit more sense how you can award the
    prize winner the investment without too much previous negotiation on
    valuation, etc.

    The other place I've seen this model is through an event we (Angelsoft)
    helped out in Oregon. They have an event called Angel Oregon, where around
    50 angel investors put in $5000, and then they collectively choose the
    winner. I can't remember if they did a convertable note or not, but the
    event seemed to be a big win for them. Most of the startups involved got
    traction, the winner went on to VC round, and because of the low entry on
    the investment side they helped recruit a few new angel investors for their
    angel fun.

    Here's the link: http://www.oen.org/events/ao/

    Sorry I missed your event, thanks to Nate for filling me in.
  • Thanks for the response, Mark.
  • I don't know the details. I'll get Mark Davis to reveal more.

    To your point, though, I wonder if the competitiveness and other
    benefits of these things outweight the overhead of putting them on.

    Another good question for Mark: what was the internal sell?

    This message was sent from my phone. Please excuse any typos.
  • Like the commentary dude. I'd like to see some innovation in the solar panel space so I can power my home with it. Good thing there is ample sunlight in California.
  • drew
    I talked to Yan. They might have something. But they shd avoid the No Longer Big 3 and focus on scooters. Simpler, faster. Then go to Detroit. They need too much money. I thought the Epi guys might have something but there's a question about their ability to execute. WTF $50K and they get an exclusive license from Brown to relicense their technology to companies that might know what they are doing. Cheap. Widetronix seems to have a production cost advantage but nothing game changing otherwise. Their problem is a high price point that cuts out mass applications (besides heart pacemakers). (Ironically Grey's Anatomy doing heart surgery now as I type.) Other problem is that 20 year battery life is longer than service life of 99% of consumer gizmos. NASA and DoD are the places for them. Just saw the intro for JetEye. Not a big biz. become a DoD contractor and then a deal with GE or PW.

    My pick would have been epi. They could make their business go or at least get the license with the 250K. The other guys really needed too much more than that to get going.
  • awesome job nate! i wanted to be there but with the cnet/cbs stuff this morning, my schedule became completely out of whack and i had to go see the people at drop.io for the video interview. in any case, great reporting - perhaps i could hire you for future live reporting?
  • Wow, Yan Engines sounds really interesting...drop some more 411 on those guys if you get a chance to speak to them.
blog comments powered by Disqus