<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>innonate &#187; Social Content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://innonate.com/tag/social-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://innonate.com</link>
	<description>Exploring the social side of innovation, technology, business, and public policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Social Content</title>
		<link>http://innonate.com/2008/05/19/social-content/</link>
		<comments>http://innonate.com/2008/05/19/social-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 16:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nate Westheimer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BricaBox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web-trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[43things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aviary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scribd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yelp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innonate.com/?p=649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I talk about the BIG VISION for BricaBox, I often find myself repeating a definition for &#8220;social content website&#8221; &#8212; because that&#8217;s the scope of our platform, and those are the kinds of sites we set out to power. &#8230; <a href="http://innonate.com/2008/05/19/social-content/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I talk about the BIG VISION for BricaBox, I often find myself repeating a definition for &#8220;social content website&#8221; &#8212; because that&#8217;s the scope of our platform, and those are the kinds of sites we set out to power.</p>
<p>Currently, my best definition of &#8220;social content&#8221; is this:</p>
<p><em><strong>&#8220;Websites where a group of people collaborate on a base of content.&#8221;</strong></em></p>
<p>While I&#8217;ve thought about including a qualifier like &#8220;&#8230; using a common format&#8221; to the end of that definition, I think it&#8217;s pretty good right now.</p>
<p>Here are some examples of &#8220;social content&#8221; sites, so you can see the scope of this genre:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Wikipedia</strong> is a &#8220;social content&#8221; website</li>
<li><strong>YouTube</strong> fits this bill</li>
<li><strong>Yelp</strong> is an example</li>
<li><strong>Scribd</strong> is a social content site for documents</li>
<li><strong>43things</strong> is a social content site</li>
<li><strong>Digg</strong> is also a social content site</li>
<li><strong>Aviary</strong> is a social content platform</li>
</ul>
<p>What&#8217;s your definition of &#8220;social content sites&#8221;? Have you ever thought of all these sites being under one genre?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://innonate.com/2008/05/19/social-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
