NYTM – What's Next?

Organize
Last night, I “won” (results) Organizer responsibilities of the NY Tech Meetup, taking the reins from Scott Heiferman and Dawn Barber in running the monthly Meetup of 7,500 members.

The election for the role was about doing more than just meeting once a month and was about building, in Scott’s words, a real “21st Century organization.”

My platform was different from the other candidates in that it was a plan for the entire ecosystem of NY tech organizations and community organizers — not just the NYTM. In fact, I was pretty open about the fact my plan could happen with our without the NYTM; nonetheless, when asked to take that plan to the NYTM election, I became confident that we, as a NYTM community, can rally to get the good work done that needs to be done on behalf of all.

So what needs to be done? Here are the next steps, in my mind. Comment below if you have any others to add:

  1. Transition. I’m meeting with Scott and Dawn first thing next week to get caught up to speed on the organization’s books, logistics for next month’s Meetup, and how to proceed forming an advisory board.
  2. Advisory Board formation. Working with Dawn and Scott, these positions should be settled before the January 6th Meetup.
  3. January 6th Meetup! I want this one to be great! Get ready to see some super cool technology and for a super cool guest MC.
  4. At the Meetup, I’ll announce the formation of the Organizer Board. This is where I see the hard work getting done and the community truly benefiting. Are you ready for it? If you saw my pitch, you get the idea of what this means, but essentially I’m calling on self-identified community organizers to step up to the plate and be the inward and outward evangelist of their niche and the NY tech community at large. More details to come.
  5. Work with the Advisory Board on basic format changes for the Meetup, securing financial well being of the organization, and confirming the Organizer Board.
  6. Finalize Organizer Board and start working together on behalf of the broader NY tech community!
  7. Work with Organizer Board, with guidance from Advisory Board, to determine metrics of organizing success and technology to help us organize better!
  8. Organize!
  9. Organize!
  10. Organize!

Of course there’s more here, but you get the idea: Your Meetup is going to remain mostly the same with a few enhancements, while, in the background, folks are given a platform to amplify their community organizing effort through coordination and collaboration with the the other great work that’s going on out there.

As a result of these new responsibilities, I’m also pleased to announce that David S. Rose and Rose Tech Ventures have extended my position as Entrepreneur in Residence through Q1’09. This will allow me to dedicate a very large portion of my time to achieving these goals set for the New York Tech Meetup, and to front load my term with the resources needed to build the organizational infrastructure my plan requires.

Finally, there are a billion people to thank. While I won’t manage to thank everyone that deserves it on this blog, I must recognize Charlie O’Donnell for first calling for me to do this; David S. Rose for his ongoing support of the NY tech community; my nextNY community for introducing me on the wonderful world of NY tech; my roommate Michael Galpert for the awesome Shepard Fairey-esk campaign logo you see above (which was created in Aviary, I must add); Girls in Tech, the Web 2.0 Expo team, and GroundReport.com for their endorsements; the list goes on but I’m late to an interview!

And, most importantly, thank you to Scott and Dawn for building this great organization and getting us this far. You two are the reason this amazing opportunity exists.

Now it’s time to get to work.

This entry was posted in Leadership, Web-trends, nextNY. Bookmark the permalink.
  • super cool, nate. congrats and look forward to seeing what you make of it!
  • Congrats Nate! Excited to see the NYTM evolve. I hope one of your first orders of business is develop a more transparent way of selecting presenters for the meetups. This was one of the main issues with the current structure (discussed by CenterNetworks and others) and possibly the main reason that Scott stepped down. I highly advise you to nip this in the butt quickly before pursuing greater goals...
  • Thanks Kareem,

    This is an interesting dilemma indeed.

    I'm all for hearing ideas on how to best pick presenters. Most
    important is that they're fun and interesting to attendees, of course.
    Also, having the ability to curate the event is important, so we could
    have all mobile/social apps one month.

    Anyway, send any specific suggestions my way!
  • I think the first thing would be to set very specific, clear rules for
    presenters, instead of falling back on the fuzzy statement "fun and
    interesting to attendees" which could easily be interpreted as "what Nate thinks is fun and interesting". Examples of rules may be presenters can only present once every six months, presenters must present functionality that has been released within the last 6 months, etc...
    These rules would obviously need to be well thought out but set in place sooner rather then later and then iterated on when problems/loopholes arise. It may be helpful to get an expert in game theory involved.

    My belief is that everyone that has developed something new should get
    a chance to present and let the attendees determine whether its "fun
    and interesting". As the cliche goes, "beauty is in the eye of the
    beholder". That said, depending on what the backlog of presenters are,
    it may take some very creative thinking on how to do this
    democratically.

    I'll think about this some more over the weekend.
  • Josh
    congrats, bro.
  • Liz
    Congratulations and good luck!

    How is the Advisory Board different from the Organizer Board? In terms of duties & responsibilities?

    I think it might be time to prune down the list of 7500 people on the memers' list to those of whom might be active members and create an email list for people who just want to receive notices of the MeetUp's activities. I mean, less than 10% of the membership took time to vote, I think a lot of people just lurk and never come to a meetup or participate.

    I think having an inflated membership number is misleading and creates different expectation than if the group was a group of 1000 or 1500 active members (attending at least one meeting a year). Just a thought.
  • The Advisory Board is for guidance on the direction of the organization and NY tech community. These folks will be folks like Scott and Dawn, as well as other long-time NY tech influencers.

    The Organizer Board will be full of folks like me -- folks willing to dedicate important time to coordinating among all the NY tech groups out there. So one's an advisory board and one's a working board.
  • Good work man. Congrats!
  • I'm proud of you and will buy you one more beer.

    aaron
  • Nate, congrats on the new role. We welcome you. Two suggestions: find a bigger venue and open the Meetup to more people. No you-have-one-hour-to-RSVP stuff. The WebInnovators Group in Boston, which is similar in format to NYTM, had 1200 people attend last week!
  • I agree. There could very well be a better venue. I'll be looking in
    the coming weeks.

    N
  • Congrats Nate! I am so happy to see you in the role. Thanks for stepping up to the plate, and we are all here to support you.
blog comments powered by Disqus