Power Alley


Photo Credit: kretyen

In order to survive the 21st Century, America needs both a massive amount of new, renewable power sources, as well as (and starting with) a new, smarter power grid to bring them together.

The same could be said about leadership and infrastructure in the New York City technology industry.

For a long time, people have called for “new investment!” “new government aide!” “new talent!” and “new Meetups!” It’s the rallying cry of the frantic — those who crave something more, but don’t know how to articulate it or accomplish it. It’s the rallying cry of the unwise — those who think “new” and “more” are what bring real change.

Recently, however, there been a much more reasonable call emerging from the Alley’s more weathered folks.

At a New York City Council hearing in late October, both David S. Rose (“Silicon Alley Patriarch” and my boss) and Charlie O’Donnell (entrepreneur, founder of 1,800 strong nextNY, and my friend) called for the same thing:

“New coordination!”

David and Charlie are right on the money.

Coordination is the smart grid of communities, and it’s always the first place to start when seeking to advance them.

Why? Because coordination doesn’t call for anything new. “New” is easy to call for — just like “bigger” — but coordination is the hard work that hasn’t been tried out here. “New” is the stuff of those who want attention, while coordination is the stuff of community organizers — those who want a vibrant, headless ecosystem.

So, what does coordination look like?

Coordination looks like identifying already organized programs in the community, like NYSIA’s internship program, and making sure every other already organized group — especially constituencies (departments and career offices) at Universities — know about it.

Coordination looks like making sure every already organized entrepreneur group and VC knows about every already existing government program, tax benefit, and government-led opportunity.

Coordination looks like making sure New York Angels attend the ITP Winter Show, so hot beds of already organized great ideas are connected to already organized great investors.

We don’t need more great ideas or new great investors — we need more coordination!

But there’s also a second side to this.

Because coordination happens at the top (it’s a organizer to organizer thing) it can only provide optimization — massive optimization! — but rarely does anything “new” come about.

Coordination, is the first step because there are massive inefficiencies without it, but a healthy ecosystem does need new sources of power.

Here, it sounds as if I go back on myself. Before, I said “new” was the thing of community wannabes taking the easy way out. Today, I stand by that. Tomorrow, however, after a smarter grid  makes our existing organizations stronger, we will finally be a position to take stock of what’s missing from the equation and act.

It is only then — after we have been optimized — that “new” means progress. Communities will have new needs and unmet needs, and while the already organized organizations of a community can be wonderful at absorbing these challenges, here lies the opportunity to make something new, to develop new organizational leadership, and tie it and them into the now smarter grid of community power.

On the eve of the election for the New York Tech Meetup’s next Organizer, great expectations and anticipation swirl through the Alley. Some hold the belief that the next Organizer of that Meetup — one of many organizations in the great New York tech community — can somehow muster so much from the position and the organization’s members that a seismic change will occur.

Unless the next Organizer’s rallying cry — and only rallying cry — is to coordinate, she or he will flail and flounder, drunk with ideas of “bigger” and “new.”

If there is a single plank in the next Organizer’s platform branded with the words “new” or “more,” I advise the Meetup’s members to stay away, unless those words are followed by the word “coordination.”

Finally, in the end, I don’t think it matters all that much. Though I am a loyal and loving member of the New York Tech Meetup, I believe such coordination will occur through it, with it, or without it. While I hope, and will vote, that the next Organizer has the capacity to embrace and drive this coordination, I am confident it will happen regardless.

There is much work to be done. We are the Change we’ve been waiting for.

This entry was posted in Leadership, nextNY. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Nate,
    Great post. It sounds like some of the things you and others are clamoring for are the same types of things I’ve been working on in the NY Microsoft developer community the past 3 years. When I took on my current role as a Developer Evangelist at Microsoft, one of my tasks was “to support the .NET developer community”. I didn’t know what that meant at the time.

    I came from a consulting background, and had little exposure to the “community” or user groups or meetups, etc. I quickly came up to speed and was surprised to learn there were over 25 different Microsoft-tech focused user groups throughout the tri-state area! All of these groups are run by volunteers in the community, each with their own organization and dedicated membership. They range in size from 10-15 people to over a couple of hundred people.

    My role was to be a liaison between the group organizers, community influencers (experts who speak at these things), and the company to provide them with anything they need. For some details on the lay-of-the-land in the Microsoft tech community, see Jean Barmash’s excellent post: http://tinyurl.com/5hc6s3

    While the groups were mostly well organized themselves, there was very little organization and/or collaboration across the groups. Some of these groups knew about each other. Others did not. I started out with grand intentions to try and “organize” these groups together into a single “NY Area Microsoft tech group” with SIGs. I quickly learned that that was NOT going to work (for many different reasons).

    Most of these groups cherished their independence and the work that their owners put in to establishing them. Also, these groups had various different audiences… some with overlap, some with none. So the notion of folding all of the groups into a “master organization” wasn’t going to work.

    What I ended up doing was reaching out to each of the groups personally to let them know I was there to help coordinate/organize with community events. I then invited all of the organizers together in person so they could get to know one another. After that, I started hosting a monthly conference call with all of the user group leaders.

    The call is just a way for all of us to touch base and let each other know what is going on. Folks share event announcements, help locate speakers for other groups’ meetings, etc. It’s been a great resource for coordinating major events and cross-pollinating some of the presenter talent throughout the area. We also discuss Microsoft-specific stuff on there too. There are about 35-40 people that are invited to the call and about an average of 15-20 who join each month.

    In the past 6 months, I’ve taken things a step further by setting up a formal mailing list (as a private Yahoo group) for all of the organizers to communicate back and forth. If someone is hosting an event in North Jersey, they can share on the mailing list, which the user group leaders in NYC and Long Island might share with their membership to increase awareness. It’s like an organized “word-of-mouth” system.

    There are always ways to improve this type of “cross-community” collaboration. A central portal and/or calendaring system are still a holy-grail that no one seems able to commit to. We have some attempts at it, but they are currently labor intensive. I maintain a listing of all the groups on my blog (http://www.peterlaudati.com), and do a monthly post listing all of the group meeting dates, speakers, & topics.

    We also have a system developed by one of my co-workers called Community Megaphone (http://www.communitymegaphone.com) that allows each organizer to enter their own meeting information into it. Comm Megaphone then provides a ICS calendar for folks to browse with mapping information. Comm Megaphone also provides an HTML gadget each group can add to their site that lists “upcoming events” in the system. It’s a great way to cross-promote each others’ groups. This open system is just getting started, and depends on the individual communities to use it.

    As I’ve become more involved in, and aware of, the other tech communities in NYC, I’ve longed for some cross-collaboration there too. While the NY Microsoft community has become tight knit over the past few years, I feel it is still silo-ed off from the rest of the NYC Tech community.

    From your post, I’m hearing that there may be silo-ing amongst the other existing tech communities in NYC. I’m most definitely interested in lending my experiences with the NY Microsoft tech community to see if we can achieve some sort of collaboration between all of the NYC tech communities!
    -Peter
  • Peter,

    Awesome comment.

    I think there's a lot to be learned from developer community
    evangelists and the work that big companies do to make themselves a
    part of communities.

    Thanks for telling your story here for others to learn from.
  • Nate,

    You are spot on. As with everything right now - we need to figure out how to do more with less. This is a time of coordinating and making the most of what we have already - to provide the biggest bang.

    And we're entrepreneurs, right? So producing something amazing with no additional investment is something that many of your readers understand!
  • Exactly! It's the entrepreneurial thing to do!
  • Bingo! Right on the money, as usual. Nate for Mayor!
  • Nate - Have you ever reviewed the research by Michael Porter relating to "Clusters and Cluster Development"? I think relevant to (and supports) your post. Regards, John

    http://www.isc.hbs.edu/econ-clusters.htm
    Clusters are geographic concentrations of interconnected companies, specialized suppliers, service providers, and associated institutions in a particular field that are present in a nation or region. Clusters arise because they increase the productivity with which companies can compete. The development and upgrading of clusters is an important agenda for governments, companies, and other institutions. Cluster development initiatives are an important new direction in economic policy, building on earlier efforts in macroeconomic stabilization, privatization, market opening, and reducing the costs of doing business.
  • Never read it but will now!

    Looks great.
  • Nate:

    Let's connect on some ideas of yours and mine. I can't find your email so I just am commenting here. This was however a cool post.
blog comments powered by Disqus