<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook App Users Worth 90% &#8211; 99% less than WWW Users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://innonate.com/2007/10/18/facebook-app-users-worth-90-99-less-than-www-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://innonate.com/2007/10/18/facebook-app-users-worth-90-99-less-than-www-users/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 01:07:41 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Westheimer</title>
		<link>http://innonate.com/2007/10/18/facebook-app-users-worth-90-99-less-than-www-users/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Westheimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innonate.com/2007/10/18/facebook-app-users-worth-90-99-less-than-www-users/#comment-249</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t heard of anyone getting anything other than remnant  CPMs or CPCs for Facebook apps -- besides Facebook itself, that is!

There will be &quot;algorithms&quot; to enhance this, but clearly there&#039;s only so much value you can extract by putting an ad next to a &quot;Zombie&quot; profile. Facebook apps, in general, do nothing to quell the perception that problem that social networks are dangerous for brands.

As for BricaBox... there may be some integration a year from now. But you&#039;re right, it&#039;s the first to get pushed down in our development cycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t heard of anyone getting anything other than remnant  CPMs or CPCs for Facebook apps &#8212; besides Facebook itself, that is!</p>
<p>There will be &#8220;algorithms&#8221; to enhance this, but clearly there&#8217;s only so much value you can extract by putting an ad next to a &#8220;Zombie&#8221; profile. Facebook apps, in general, do nothing to quell the perception that problem that social networks are dangerous for brands.</p>
<p>As for BricaBox&#8230; there may be some integration a year from now. But you&#8217;re right, it&#8217;s the first to get pushed down in our development cycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://innonate.com/2007/10/18/facebook-app-users-worth-90-99-less-than-www-users/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innonate.com/2007/10/18/facebook-app-users-worth-90-99-less-than-www-users/#comment-248</guid>
		<description>Nice post Nate.  Do you know what the advertising numbers look like?  Are advertisers valuing FB users at a similar discount?
M&amp;A user value is one metric.  But,if you can get a comparable CPM, CPC, etc for a FB user as a web user, than the value of fast, immediate, viral growth within FB can be worth building a FB app.
Does this post mean that we will not be seeing a BricaBox facebook app?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post Nate.  Do you know what the advertising numbers look like?  Are advertisers valuing FB users at a similar discount?<br />
M&amp;A user value is one metric.  But,if you can get a comparable CPM, CPC, etc for a FB user as a web user, than the value of fast, immediate, viral growth within FB can be worth building a FB app.<br />
Does this post mean that we will not be seeing a BricaBox facebook app?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
