Comments on: The Web 2.0 Valuation Project http://innonate.com/2006/12/30/the-web-20-valuation-project/ Exploring the social side of innovation, technology, business, and public policy Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:45:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: I was right. Facebook is spun. http://innonate.com/2006/12/30/the-web-20-valuation-project/comment-page-1/#comment-5155 I was right. Facebook is spun. Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:48:22 +0000 http://innonate.com/2006/12/30/the-web-20-valuation-project/#comment-5155 [...] report that Facebook apps were being sold off at a dollar per user. My own analysis of Web 2.0 Valuations, says a normal web application should get $20 per user! Was it 20X easier to acquire a user on [...] [...] report that Facebook apps were being sold off at a dollar per user. My own analysis of Web 2.0 Valuations, says a normal web application should get $20 per user! Was it 20X easier to acquire a user on [...]

]]> By: Harry Hvostov http://innonate.com/2006/12/30/the-web-20-valuation-project/comment-page-1/#comment-4969 Harry Hvostov Sat, 01 Mar 2008 09:34:59 +0000 http://innonate.com/2006/12/30/the-web-20-valuation-project/#comment-4969 There are 3 ways to do valuation of Any business, Web 2.0 included: 1. Income approach. 2. Market approach. 3. Asset approach.\ For most young Web 2.0 start-ups, without much earnings history, the Discounted Cash Flow method under the income approach is the best bet. Check out the economics behind the 3 approaches at: http://www.valuadder.com/valuationguide/business-valuation-three-approaches.html There are 3 ways to do valuation of Any business, Web 2.0 included:

1. Income approach.
2. Market approach.
3. Asset approach.\

For most young Web 2.0 start-ups, without much earnings history, the Discounted Cash Flow method under the income approach is the best bet.

Check out the economics behind the 3 approaches at:

http://www.valuadder.com/valuationguide/business-valuation-three-approaches.html

]]> By: Neil http://innonate.com/2006/12/30/the-web-20-valuation-project/comment-page-1/#comment-4840 Neil Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:43:24 +0000 http://innonate.com/2006/12/30/the-web-20-valuation-project/#comment-4840 Like you I am trying to get a handle on Web 2.0 valuation metrics. Have there been further updates since your December 30, 2006 posting? Like you I am trying to get a handle on Web 2.0 valuation metrics. Have there been further updates since your December 30, 2006 posting?

]]> By: 35 Discarded Web 2.0 Domain Names | Quality Nonsense http://innonate.com/2006/12/30/the-web-20-valuation-project/comment-page-1/#comment-4811 35 Discarded Web 2.0 Domain Names | Quality Nonsense Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:11:35 +0000 http://innonate.com/2006/12/30/the-web-20-valuation-project/#comment-4811 [...] Web 2.0 startup worth it’s $15 billion valuation needs a brandable domain name. Something that’s available to register and sounds deep while [...] [...] Web 2.0 startup worth it’s $15 billion valuation needs a brandable domain name. Something that’s available to register and sounds deep while [...]

]]> By: Kay http://innonate.com/2006/12/30/the-web-20-valuation-project/comment-page-1/#comment-4805 Kay Wed, 07 Nov 2007 07:59:36 +0000 http://innonate.com/2006/12/30/the-web-20-valuation-project/#comment-4805 Hi, I'm working on a case on WEB2.0, can I just get your E-mail address and we can dicuss it? or you can contact me at liupu_kay@hotmail.com (it's also my MSN ID) Thks a lot, Waiting your reply! Hi, I’m working on a case on WEB2.0, can I just get your E-mail address and we can dicuss it?
or you can contact me at liupu_kay@hotmail.com (it’s also my MSN ID)

Thks a lot,

Waiting your reply!

]]> By: seth http://innonate.com/2006/12/30/the-web-20-valuation-project/comment-page-1/#comment-4439 seth Wed, 03 Oct 2007 22:32:21 +0000 http://innonate.com/2006/12/30/the-web-20-valuation-project/#comment-4439 This is the first useful data I've seen on this. This is the first useful data I’ve seen on this.

]]>